Redford has no one to blame but herself

Len Weber will disagree, but Alison Redford made this guy's "nice" list.
Len Weber will disagree, but Alison Redford made this guy’s “nice” list.

No one, least of all politicians, likes to admit just how big a role outside forces play in one’s political success – and failure. Strong MPs are defeated when the national campaign goes south. Unexpected issues derail the best laid plans. Competing interests from within will undermine even the most successful leaders.

That’s largely what happened to the last two Alberta Premiers. Ralph Klein saved the PC party from certain defeat in 1993, won 4 majorities, and eliminated the debt. His party showed its gratitude with a 55% leadership review.

All his successor did was increase the size of their majority, winning 72 of 83 seats. Three years later, the party brass quietly shoved Ed Stelmach aside.

I’ve written enough about Klein and Stelmach’s shortcomings to fill the legislature library, but even I will admit they got a raw deal. I wouldn’t call either a sympathetic figure, but in their own peculiar ways, they got the job done, only to be shown the door. Redford however, left her party with little choice.

It’s true that Redford was up against a few daunting obstacles. She won the party leadership with only 2 MLAs supporting her – and one of those MLAs was named Alison Redford. Unlike past PC leaders who could brush off a largely inept Liberal opposition with a few good NEP horror stories, Redford faced a new threat in the form of the Wildrose Alliance. And, as the old adage goes, governments tend to stumble during their 12th term in office.

Faced with this, it’s tempting to cast Redford as a victim of the fates. That likely would have been a fair narrative had she been buried in 2012 under a groundswell of support for Danielle Smith. But Redford won a convincing majority, giving her a clean mandate and plenty of political capital to spend. It turns out Alison Redford spends political capital as quickly as taxpayer dollars.

Soon after the election, Redford found herself in trouble for accepting a $430,000 donation from Edmonton Oilers owner Daryl Katz. Katz was looking for government support for a new arena, so bankrolling Redford’s re-election campaign was likely a better investment for him than giving Shawn Horcoff 5.5 million a year. But it raised serious questions about Redford’s judgment – doubts which only grew when conflict of interest allegations surfaced surrounding a contract she had given to her ex-husband’s law firm. In both instances, Redford had a remarkably difficult time providing a clear explanation, and keeping her story straight.

It was reminiscent of her first scandal – the one which nearly cost her the 2012 election. Shortly after winning the leadership, Redford found herself in dire straights over the “money for nothing” controversy, when it came to light that MLAs were receiving $1,000 a month to sit on a committee which hadn’t met in four years. Opposition members quickly did the sensible thing and returned the money. Redford called the gesture a “stunt” and said there was nothing wrong with the committee – but hung her MLAs out to dry by suggesting there would be electoral consequences if they didn’t pay back the cash. Her caucus whip said voters were too stupid to understand the issue. In the end, Redford ordered her MLAs to return the funds, but only a month later, after the polls went south.

This pattern repeated itself with the controversy that would ultimately be her undoing. It started with extremely poor judgment, when Redford spent $45,000 of taxpayer dollars on a flight back from Nelson Mandela’s funeral (plus $3 for headphones). As per her modus operandi, Redford defended the move, changed her story, stalled, waited for the controversy to explode – and then acted, repaying the money. By that point, other revelations of misspending had surfaced, and there was no way out of the death spiral.

All leaders face scandals. The difference for Redford was that nearly all of these were of her own making. Each time, Redford showed herself to be out of touch with taxpayers, dithered and changed her story, and failed to act until the damage had been done. While there will no doubt be a temptation to paint Redford as a tragic figure, undone by 43 years of PC baggage and a party know who pulls out the knives at the first sign of trouble, she really has no one to blame for her failure but herself.

You are not authorized to see this part
Please, insert a valid App ID, otherwise your plugin won’t work correctly.

8 responses to “Redford has no one to blame but herself”

  1. No doubt Redford will run away and join her fellow shamed Liberals Dalton McGuinty and Michael Ignatieff in the entitled progressive dumping grounds at Harvard

  2. In Canada, being the first female leader of something seems to be a curse. From Rita Johnson, Kim Campbell and Audrey McLaughlin to the female premiers of late, it’s a hard road.

    • A big reason for it is that many tired longtime governing parties seem to choose female leaders as a way to “refresh” their brand and provide a new start. That would include Rita Johnson, Kim Campbell, Alison Redford, (arguably) Kathy Dunderdale, Christy Clark (though it worked out in the end for her), and Kathleen Wynne (we shall see). Their problems all had as much to do with their predecessors as with themselves.

      • ” […] parties seem to choose female leaders as a way to ‘refresh’ their brand and provide a new start.”

        Or to leave them holding the bag when it’s obvious that the party is going to get clobbered in the next election. That’s certainly how I see Kim Campbell and Rita Johnson, anyway – they were each the fall guy (or gal).

      • Johnson and Campbell definitely, and you can make the case for Wynne (though, as you say, the future of that remains to be decided).

        Dunderdale? No way. Danny Williams left her with the PC Party riding high, and she won a crushing reelection victory. While it’s true the government had been around for a while and inevitably you have to deal with that, she got as good a place to start as a premier could wish for.

        Redford is a split case. She made a lot of her own mistakes, but the Alberta Tories are looking increasingly like a machine that is effectively ungovernable.

  3. The Bilderberg Conference was the beginning of the end then enraging Alberta pharmacists. It is clear that Redford has no respect for the concerns of Albertans or their intelligence. Overpaying for the flood was an embarrassment, hiring PR firms, paying for 100% of damages with no risk for where you choose to build, destroying property in High River as a result of poor consultation with the RCMP over gun seizures. These are not exogenous factors. Poor numbers in High River and Calgary despite huge flood payouts indicate a huge problem.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Plugin from the creators of Brindes Personalizados :: More at Plulz Wordpress Plugins