{"id":945,"date":"2006-05-29T23:29:00","date_gmt":"2006-05-30T03:29:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=945"},"modified":"2006-05-29T23:29:00","modified_gmt":"2006-05-30T03:29:00","slug":"afghanistan-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=945","title":{"rendered":"Afghanistan &#8211; 2"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/calgarygrit.blogspot.com\/2006\/05\/afghanistan.html\">I posted a while back<\/a> on why I felt it was foolish to read too much into what was, for all intents and purposes, a meaningless vote on Afghanistan. However, it&#8217;s becoming more and more apparent that this is a very politically charged issue that will play a major role in both the Liberal leadership race and the next federal election. This has been the first topic nearly every Liberal I&#8217;ve talked to this week has brought up and most people have very strong opinions on it.<\/p>\n<p>And since we&#8217;re now locked in until 2009, it&#8217;s certain to be a major election issue in the next campaign. So I&#8217;m going to do what every politician does, but always self-righteously tell others not to do, and &#8220;play politics&#8221; with this issue.<\/p>\n<p><em>From a purely strategic point of view<\/em>, I think it would have made a lot more sense for the Liberal Party to come out strongly against to the extension of the mission. We&#8217;ve fulfilled our original commitment which was only agreed to on the understanding that we could open up our troops for deployment elsewhere. There&#8217;s a very good chance that troops will be needed in the Sudan within the next three years and it&#8217;s obvious that we won&#8217;t be able to help there with ground forces because of the Afghanistan mission. The majority of Canadians oppose the extension of the mission and you can&#8217;t beat a government in power by taking the exact same position as them (unless, you know, their party is under RCMP investigation and the subject of several corruption inquiries&#8230;). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.canada.com\/ottawacitizen\/news\/story.html?id=17b87682-13f0-4069-a0f5-521b1f9e0ef0&#038;k=62084\">70% of Quebecers <\/a>oppose the extension and it&#8217;s my opinion that Quebecers will be more likely to vote for a party which shares their values and policy opinions than one led by the leader with the most perfect French.<\/p>\n<p>With that in mind, I think Michael Ignatieff (and Scott Brison, to a lesser extent) are going to be hurt by this issue if it becomes <em>the <\/em>defining issue of the leadership campaign (a la Meech 1990).<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s not to say that Michael Ignatieff was wrong to vote in favour of the mission. Voting &#8220;no&#8221; would have gone against everything he&#8217;s ever believed in on foreign affairs. But by voting yes, he&#8217;ll be tying himself up in the John Kerry knot if he takes a different position in the next campaign. With Ignatieff at the helm, the Liberal party would effectively be taking the issue off the table during the next campaign.<\/p>\n<p>And this brings me to the one thing about the whole Ignatieff candidacy which really perplexes me. Given his background, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a stretch to say that Iggy&#8217;s policy expertise is in foreign affairs. That&#8217;s what he&#8217;s studied his entire life and that&#8217;s what he feels most passionately about. Yet on foreign affairs, very few Liberals agree with him. He was <em>for<\/em> the Iraq war, he was <em>for<\/em> missile defense, and he&#8217;s now <em>for<\/em> the Afghanistan mission extension. During the last election campaign, he wrote<a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecrimson.com\/article.aspx?ref=510552\"> the following<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family:times new roman;\">Ignatieff said that Republican foreign policy, focusing on promoting democracy, is better suited to the situation in the Middle East than what he termed the cautious, pragmatic neo-isolationism offered by the Democrats. &#8220;The times require real vision in the Middle East,&#8221; he said.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I know very few Liberals who&#8217;d agree with this (but, then again, there aren&#8217;t a lot of Liberals in Calgary for me to agree with). Given his lack of experience on domestic issues, I have a hard time understanding the paradox of how a &#8220;vision and policy&#8221; campaign which focuses on foreign affairs can be so successful when hardly any Liberals agree with the candidate himself on foreign policy. <\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not trying to throw mud here because if there&#8217;s anything which is fair game to criticize other candidates on, it&#8217;s their policy positions. I&#8217;m just generally perplexed on this one.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I posted a while back on why I felt it was foolish to read too much into what was, for all intents and purposes, a meaningless vote on Afghanistan. However, it&#8217;s becoming more and more apparent that this is a very politically charged issue that will play a major role in both the Liberal leadership [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-945","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/945","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=945"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/945\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=945"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=945"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=945"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}