{"id":826,"date":"2006-03-04T16:38:00","date_gmt":"2006-03-04T21:38:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=826"},"modified":"2006-03-04T16:38:00","modified_gmt":"2006-03-04T21:38:00","slug":"unanswered-questions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=826","title":{"rendered":"Unanswered Questions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>First of all, let me say that I agree with <a href=\"http:\/\/weblogs.macleans.ca\/paulwells\/archives\/week_2006_02_26-2006_03_04.asp#002195\">Paul Wells <\/a>that Bernard Shapiro should resign. There&#8217;s no point in having an ethics commissioner if no one is willing to accept his legitimacy. And so long as there is <a href=\"http:\/\/calgarygrit.blogspot.com\/2006\/02\/in-support-of-floor-crossing-bill.html\">no rule against floor crossing<\/a>, I really don&#8217;t think these matters should be investigated.<\/p>\n<p>That said, this entire affair is just bizarre and raises a ton of questions. I won&#8217;t even begin to try and answer them.<\/p>\n<p>1. Why did Harper <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thestar.com\/NASApp\/cs\/ContentServer?pagename=thestar\/Layout\/Article_Type1&#038;c=Article&amp;amp;amp;cid=1141426211974&#038;call_pageid=968332188774&amp;col=968350116467\">strengthen the ethics commissioner&#8217;s power<\/a>, in one of his first acts in office, so that his findings could not be overturned? If he thought Shapiro was illegitimate then, he certainly wouldn&#8217;t have done that. So if he thought Shapiro was legitimate a few weeks ago, has he only changed his mind now that he disagrees with Shapiro&#8217;s decision?<\/p>\n<p>2. Why did Harper make reference to Shapiro not investigating <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thestar.com\/NASApp\/cs\/ContentServer?pagename=thestar\/Layout\/Article_Type1&#038;c=Article&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;cid=1141426211974&#038;call_pageid=968332188774&amp;col=968350116467\">Brison crossing the floor <\/a>when Shapiro wasn&#8217;t even the ethics commissioner then? Should he also investigate Jack Horner?<\/p>\n<p>3. Why did Shapiro choose to investigate this incident, but not Belinda&#8217;s crossing?<\/p>\n<p>4. Given that the Tories <em>wanted<\/em> Shapiro to investigate Belinda&#8217;s crossing, shouldn&#8217;t they <em>want<\/em> him to investigate this one?<\/p>\n<p>5. Why did the Tories applaud when Shapiro decided to investigate Ujjal during the &#8220;comfy fur&#8221; fiasco, but not this incident?<\/p>\n<p>6. If Shapiro stays on, will Harper put any stock into future Shapiro investigations? Or will he only boycott investigations he disagrees with?<\/p>\n<p>7. Isn&#8217;t it kind of disingenuous of Harper to use a technicality to get out of this by saying &#8220;the House wasn&#8217;t sitting&#8221; when this occurred? Wasn&#8217;t he supposed to be above this sort of stuff? Or was that just <a href=\"http:\/\/calgarygrit.blogspot.com\/2006\/02\/at-least-hes-honest.html\">campaign talk<\/a>?<\/p>\n<p>8. If a new Ethics commissioner is put in place, would it be OK for a future PM to refuse to work with him after taking office? Doesn&#8217;t that sort of politicize the position?<\/p>\n<p>9. If a party disagrees with the choice of the new ethics commissioner, could they refuse to co-operate with him in the future? How would Harper react in that situation?<\/p>\n<p>10. David Emerson said he&#8217;d resign if the Ethics commissioner found him guilty of any wrong-doings. This sort of implies to me that Emerson doesn&#8217;t mind being investigated. Right?<\/p>\n<p>11. (<em>via the comments section) <\/em>Why has Shapiro chosen to investigate a matter involving a Tory when the house wasn&#8217;t yet in session when he said during the election that he couldn&#8217;t investigate Tony Valeri&#8217;s landflip?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>First of all, let me say that I agree with Paul Wells that Bernard Shapiro should resign. There&#8217;s no point in having an ethics commissioner if no one is willing to accept his legitimacy. And so long as there is no rule against floor crossing, I really don&#8217;t think these matters should be investigated. That [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-826","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/826","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=826"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/826\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=826"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=826"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=826"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}