{"id":686,"date":"2006-01-10T20:25:00","date_gmt":"2006-01-11T01:25:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=686"},"modified":"2006-01-10T20:25:00","modified_gmt":"2006-01-11T01:25:00","slug":"en-francais","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=686","title":{"rendered":"En Francais"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A lot gets lost in translation, so I don&#8217;t want to declare a winner or try and imagine what francophones watching this debate thought. For what it&#8217;s worth, I don&#8217;t think Duceppe was as strong as he&#8217;s been in debates past. Layton was better tonight than last night and landed a very good shot against Martin in the notwithstanding clause nonsense. Both Martin and Harper were hit and miss. Harper looked dumb with his &#8220;I wasn&#8217;t expecting to answer&#8221; line while Paul turned his back on Gilles and looked bad when he mixed up Layton and Harper. But, despite that, I think both of them got their core message out.<\/p>\n<p>That said, the debate was dull, so the story won&#8217;t be about what they said. The story will be about Harper being a &#8220;player&#8221; in the debate and Duceppe attacking him. Harper&#8217;s surge in Quebec will help him coast to coast &#8211; as has been the case with <em>everything <\/em>this election, Harper has benefited from perfect timing.<\/p>\n<p><strong>As for the debate itself<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<p>5:56 pm: I&#8217;m listening to the new Liberal ads to get me pumped up for the debate. Say what you want about the content but the tribal drums in the background have got a great beat.<\/p>\n<p>6:05 pm: Oh man, did Harper ever get a bad translator. Holy nasal batman! &#8220;<em>Guys&#8230;I give me back my retainer! Guys.<\/em>..&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>6:06 pm: Martin opens up with &#8220;I supported Meech Lake&#8221;. Oh good grief.<\/p>\n<p>6:11 pm: Paul tells us to &#8220;stop the mudslinging&#8221;. I think we really need some soldiers&#8230;on the streets&#8230;in Canada, to stop the mudslinging.<\/p>\n<p>6:17 pm: Duceppe is <em>really <\/em>going after Harper. I think we know who he feels his real threat is.<\/p>\n<p>6:19 pm: I think Martin may have accused Layton of being anti-abortion&#8230;or he may have proposed a constitutional amendment to allow abortion&#8230;it&#8217;s very difficult to tell with Paul sometimes&#8230; (<strong><em>UPDATE:<\/em><\/strong> Paul Wells explains the bizarre Martin\/Layton abortion exchange in the comments section)<\/p>\n<p>6:29 pm: &#8220;The NDP is about people, about producing results. Results for people. We don&#8217;t play politics. The NDP is a deity upon itself, every action selfless.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>6:33 pm: Jack says we need MPs who work for &#8220;you&#8221;, not for their party. His halo is getting brighter and brighter.<\/p>\n<p>6:40 pm: Harper says &#8220;I&#8217;m sorry, I wasn&#8217;t expecting to have to have to answer&#8221;. Well geez, you&#8217;re not watching a movie Stephen &#8211; it&#8217;s a D-E-B-A-T-E.<\/p>\n<p>6:46 pm: This is a bit off topic, but does Harper&#8217;s hair ever grow? Or does he get daily haircuts? Inquiring minds want to know.<\/p>\n<p>6:51 pm: Woah boy, assisted suicide. Paul&#8217;s response: &#8220;I&#8217;ll give you a personal answer; Many people have assisted in my political suicide &#8211; Scott Reid, Mike Klander, David Herle&#8230;&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>7:02 pm: I can&#8217;t tell who&#8217;s winning this debate, but Martin and Duceppe hit the jackpot on the translators. Jack&#8217;s sounds like he&#8217;s a Philosophy professor at Oxford, while Harper&#8217;s must get beat up by the chess club routinely.<br \/>I&#8217;ve also got to say, Paiken asked better questions last night.<\/p>\n<p>7:13 pm: Damn those corporate CEOs and millionaires cruising around the streets of Quebec City in their minivans!<\/p>\n<p>7:14 pm: Lost in translation: &#8220;Poverty and Crime end with the same letter but are two different things&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>7:31 pm: Things are getting dull. Time for Paul to drop some more policy on the fly here: &#8220;Abolish the Senate! Annex the Turks and Caicos!&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>7:41 pm: Finally! We get the notwithstanding question! Paul has believed in this for &#8220;a long time&#8221; apparently. Well, they do say &#8220;a week is a long time in politics&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>7:48 pm: Put on your 3-D glasses now, and see Paul&#8217;s hands jet out of the TV towards you.<\/p>\n<p>7:52 pm: A side camera shows Paul wandering around aimlessly five feet from his podium. I don&#8217;t blame him; I feel like going for a walk too &#8211; this has been pretty boring.<\/p>\n<p>7:57 pm: Jack accuses Harper of offering &#8220;simplistic solutions to complex problems&#8221;. Unlike the highly complex &#8220;elect more NDP MPs&#8221; solution.<\/p>\n<p>8:06 pm: The new Gregg poll: 38-28-16-12.<\/p>\n<p>8:20 pm: Harper didn&#8217;t have a great debate, but he sure looked good in the media scrum afterwards. He goes after Martin hard on the &#8220;military commercial&#8221; and all the questions to all the leaders are about how &#8220;Harper is now a player in Quebec&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>8:23 pm: Wow. Duffy smacks down Duffy.<\/p>\n<p>8:36 pm: I think Paul did fairly well in the debate, but John Duffy is getting absolutely destroyed in the spin room. The Liberals have got to hope people aren&#8217;t watching this because it&#8217;s embarrassing.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>UPDATE:<\/em><\/strong> You can watch Duffy versus Duffy <a href=\"http:\/\/www.vwbug.ca\/images\/ProudToBeCanadian.ca_CTVs_Mike_Duffy_Stands_up.wmv\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A lot gets lost in translation, so I don&#8217;t want to declare a winner or try and imagine what francophones watching this debate thought. For what it&#8217;s worth, I don&#8217;t think Duceppe was as strong as he&#8217;s been in debates past. Layton was better tonight than last night and landed a very good shot against [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/686"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=686"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/686\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=686"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=686"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=686"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}