{"id":663,"date":"2006-01-04T00:12:00","date_gmt":"2006-01-04T05:12:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=663"},"modified":"2006-01-04T00:12:00","modified_gmt":"2006-01-04T05:12:00","slug":"policy-wonks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=663","title":{"rendered":"Policy Wonks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>While I&#8217;ve been fairly critical of the Liberal campaign (much to the chagrin of my Liberal readers), I&#8217;ve been fairly critical of Conservative policy (much to the chagrin of my Tory readers).<\/p>\n<p>However, the one piece of policy the Conservatives are proposing that I <em>really <\/em>like is the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.conservative.ca\/EN\/2275\/\">Federal Accountability Act<\/a>. Harper elaborated on the Act today and has decided to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/servlet\/story\/RTGAM.20060103.weltories0103\/BNStory\/specialDecision2006\/\">tackle polling<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m as addicted to SES as the next blogger (<em>Tories are up 1 point today OMG OMG<\/em>!!!), but government dollars being used for partisan polling is a major problem, even if no one ever really talks about it. I, in jest, asked for an <a href=\"http:\/\/calgarygrit.blogspot.com\/2005\/11\/gomery-ii_03.html\">inquiry into Earnscliffe <\/a>back in November and now Harper has echoed that, asking for an inquiry, or review into government polling. (Although it is kind of funny for Harper to say &#8220;<em>I&#8217;m suggesting it&#8217;s always been awfully convenient for Mr. Martin to set up a commission to investigate his political opponents in the Liberal party but not necessarily his own actions, which may have been dubious<\/em>&#8221; as he&#8217;s <strong>suggesting an inquiry into the actions of <em>his<\/em> political enemy.<\/strong> But I digress.)<\/p>\n<p>More importantly, Harper has promised to publish all polls conducted with government dollars within six months, presumably to embarrass any government using them for partisan purposes. He&#8217;s also promising open bidding, to prevent the Earnscliffe wiring we&#8217;ve seen in years past. I have no problem with tax dollars being spent on government polling (if contracts are fairly tendered), but when it&#8217;s done for partisan purposes, the party itself should pay.<\/p>\n<p>And, I must say, I do like the rest of the Act too:<br \/><span style=\"font-family:times new roman;\"><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family:times new roman;\">Banning corporate and union donations, while limiting personal donations to $1,000;<br \/>Overhauling lobbying laws and banning all ministers, ministerial staffers or senior public officials from lobbying<br \/>government for five years after leaving their post;<br \/>Give more power to the Lobbyists Registrar, Ethics Commissioner, Information Commissioner and the Auditor General, and;<br \/>Give the Auditor General a mandate to conduct a complete review of the more than $30 billion in annual federal grants, contributions and contracts.<\/span> <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><\/span><br \/>Banning corporate donations and limiting individual donations to $1,000 finishes what Jean Chretien&#8217;s campaign finance legislation began. Cutting down on the incestuous lobbyist\/government relationship is another step in the right direction. While I&#8217;m not sure the Auditor General <em>needs <\/em>more power, giving the AG that power could actually come back to hurt Harper if he ever forms government so I&#8217;ll give him marks for guts on that one.<\/p>\n<p>All in all, this is smart policy and popular policy. It&#8217;s also policy the NDP (and maybe the BQ and Grits) would support in the event of a Tory minority government so there&#8217;s chance it will see the light of day.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While I&#8217;ve been fairly critical of the Liberal campaign (much to the chagrin of my Liberal readers), I&#8217;ve been fairly critical of Conservative policy (much to the chagrin of my Tory readers). However, the one piece of policy the Conservatives are proposing that I really like is the Federal Accountability Act. Harper elaborated on the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/663"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=663"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/663\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=663"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=663"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=663"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}