{"id":563,"date":"2005-11-24T02:14:00","date_gmt":"2005-11-24T07:14:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=563"},"modified":"2005-11-24T02:14:00","modified_gmt":"2005-11-24T07:14:00","slug":"mid-week-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=563","title":{"rendered":"Mid-Week News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>1. The Conservatives have unveiled their confidence motion. The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/servlet\/story\/RTGAM.20051123.wpoli1123\/BNStory\/National\/\">Globe story<\/a> says this will mark the first time in over 100 years that a government will fall on an outright non-confidence motion, but I&#8217;m fairly sure Diefenbaker went down on a non-confidence motion in &#8217;63. To the best of my knowledge that&#8217;s the only other explicit non-confidence motion to ever bring down a government so at least Paul is living up to his promise about &#8220;Making History&#8221;:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family:times new roman;\">&#8220;That the House condemns the government for its arrogance in refusing to compromise with the opposition parties over the timing of the next general election and for its &#8216;culture of entitlement,&#8217; corruption, scandal, and gross abuse of public funds for political purposes and, consequently, the government no longer has the confidence of the House.&#8221;<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>2. Although the recent&#8230;uhh&#8230;<a href=\"http:\/\/calgarygrit.blogspot.com\/2005\/11\/martin-on-martin.html\">roman orgy<\/a> of spending has clearly been prematurely brought on by the upcoming election, for once I&#8217;m tempted to agree with <a href=\"http:\/\/jasoncherniak.blogspot.com\/2005\/11\/four-months-of-governing-crammed-into.html\">the official Liberal position<\/a>. The fact is, the Liberals aren&#8217;t pulling these announcements out of thin air &#8211; these are all policies that have been in the works for a while.<\/p>\n<p>Were these policies written to win vote? Probably. Should they have been completed sooner? Maybe. Are they being rushed? Likely. Do I find it humorous that every Cabinet Minister on the news last night said their announcement had been &#8220;in the works six months&#8221;? Hell yeah! <em>(apparently the whole government only started working the day Belinda crossed)<\/em><\/p>\n<p>But it&#8217;s a little unfair to say the Liberals are making up spending announcements on the fly to win votes.<\/p>\n<p>3. Star Candidates: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/servlet\/ArticleNews\/TPStory\/LAC\/20051123\/GARNEAU23\/TPNational\/Canada\">Marc Garneau <\/a>and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbc.ca\/story\/canada\/national\/2005\/11\/23\/cutler-conservative051123.html\">Allan Cutler <\/a>will be running for the Liberals and Conservatives. I&#8217;m not sure either will win, but they certainly will help. Cutler, especially, is huge because he&#8217;ll be able to keep the sponsorship issue alive.<\/p>\n<p>4. It&#8217;s no secret that I&#8217;m not a huge fan of David Herle. But when <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/servlet\/ArticleNews\/TPStory\/LAC\/20051118\/HERLE18\/TPNational\/Canada\">everyone else is knocking the guy<\/a>, there&#8217;s not a lot else I can add. There are only three reasons I can see for not tendering the contract they gave to him:<\/p>\n<p>1. The Liberals rushed the mini budget, out of fear the government was going to collapse.<br \/>2. It was an example of PMPM rewarding his friends on the government purse.<br \/>3. David Herle is the greatest pollster ever! And no one else could have come up with as good data as he did!!! The brilliance! The insight! The bang-on analysis!<\/p>\n<p>Regardless, it looks fairly unethical. I really hope Paul decides to call an i<a href=\"http:\/\/calgarygrit.blogspot.com\/2005\/11\/gomery-ii_03.html\">nquiry into this<\/a>. &#8220;Come hell or high water&#8221; and all that nonsense about &#8220;getting to the bottom of it&#8221;&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>1. The Conservatives have unveiled their confidence motion. The Globe story says this will mark the first time in over 100 years that a government will fall on an outright non-confidence motion, but I&#8217;m fairly sure Diefenbaker went down on a non-confidence motion in &#8217;63. To the best of my knowledge that&#8217;s the only other [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/563"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=563"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/563\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=563"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=563"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=563"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}