{"id":4890,"date":"2013-03-24T13:16:16","date_gmt":"2013-03-24T17:16:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=4890"},"modified":"2013-03-24T13:16:16","modified_gmt":"2013-03-24T17:16:16","slug":"a-true-debate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=4890","title":{"rendered":"A True Debate"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/trudeau-thumbs-up.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/trudeau-thumbs-up-300x239.jpg\" alt=\"trudeau thumbs up\" width=\"300\" height=\"239\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4901\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/trudeau-thumbs-up-300x239.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/trudeau-thumbs-up.jpg 563w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><br \/>\nFor a while we could pretend the Liberal leadership debates were going to effect the outcome of the race. It was just over a month ago that<a href=\"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=4784\"> Martha Hall Findlay jabbed Justin Trudeau<\/a> about his privileged upbringing, prompting many to wonder if this would be the turning point. A few weeks ago, all eyes were on the Trudeau-Garneau exchange, after the astronaut badgered the frontrunner over his lack of policy and substance. <\/p>\n<p>Yesterday, everyone knew that what happened in Montreal would have little bearing on the outcome of a race which has already been decided. For a press corps who covers politics like sporting events, this was like sitting through the third period of a blowout &#8211; the signs of boredom were visible on Twitter, and their questions to the candidates in post debate scrums were essentially variations of &#8220;<em>why aren&#8217;t you dropping out?<\/em>&#8220;.<\/p>\n<p>In response to said question, Deborah Coyne conceded she couldn&#8217;t win, but re-iterated the importance of debating ideas. <\/p>\n<p>Indeed, if you looked beyond the sport and spectacle of it, there was real substance to be gleamed from yesterday&#8217;s debate. <\/p>\n<p>In addition to what seem to have become the compulsory debate topics of pot legalization and supply management, there were meaningful exchanges on C-54, CIDA, open nominations, and the retirement age. There weren&#8217;t a lot of sound byte zingers, but for a party trying to figure out what it stands for, these were topics that needed to be discussed. Martha Hall Findlay and Deborah Coyne had a great exchange on education, identifying problems, quoting figures, and offering solutions.  Later, it would be Findlay and Murray weighing the pros and cons of pipelines. And <em>everyone <\/em>got to have their say about co-operation with the Greens and NDP. While I&#8217;m not a co-operation proponent, it&#8217;s a debate the party needs to have, and it&#8217;s important for voters to know exactly where the frontrunner stands.<\/p>\n<p>On that question, there was no doubt. Trudeau initiated the debate with Murray, and promptly dismissed co-operation as a &#8220;single minded, win-at-all-costs&#8221; idea that would remove choices from voters and leave Mulcair as PM. He, quite rightly in my opinion, argued that voters would not respond to a &#8220;hodge podge coalition&#8221; whose only uniting message was that they weren&#8217;t Stephen Harper. In the NDP leadership race, Mulcair&#8217;s victory slammed the orange door shut on co-operation, and it is now assured that Trudeau&#8217;s will have the exact same effect on the red door.<\/p>\n<p>Another issue the Liberal Party needs to sort out is the &#8220;Quebec question&#8221;, especially in light of new Quebec Liberal leader <a href=\"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=4876\">Philippe Couillard&#8217;s musings this week<\/a>. And once again, the next Liberal leader left no doubts where he stood. After touching on the topic in a break out debate with Martin Cauchon, Trudeau tossed out his prepared closing statement to revisit the issue. He talked of moving past &#8220;old squabbles and quarrels&#8221;, arguing we&#8217;ve spent too long trying to buy off Quebec rather than asking Quebecers to be at the table building the future of Canada.<\/p>\n<p>Trudeau&#8217;s detractors will dismiss this as more &#8220;hopey changey&#8221; baffle-gab that sounds pretty but means nothing. However, in the process of gabbing, Trudeau said &#8220;non&#8221; to another round of constitutional talks and re-iterated his support for the Clarity Act. More importantly, he said it in language voters can relate to and feel good about &#8211; something Jack Layton was a master of, but Michael Ignatieff could never quite pull off. In two years, Trudeau will need to debate Thomas Mulcair on this very topic, so the practice was helpful.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, if this leadership race has been nothing more than a training exercise for Justin Trudeau, it&#8217;s training that will serve him well very soon. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For a while we could pretend the Liberal leadership debates were going to effect the outcome of the race. It was just over a month ago that Martha Hall Findlay jabbed Justin Trudeau about his privileged upbringing, prompting many to wonder if this would be the turning point. A few weeks ago, all eyes were [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1102,983],"tags":[1199,1013,1000,1003,1007],"class_list":["post-4890","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-2013-lpc-leadership-race","category-federal-politics","tag-deborah-coyne","tag-joyce-murray","tag-justin-trudeau","tag-martha-hall-findlay","tag-martin-cauchon"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4890","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4890"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4890\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4905,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4890\/revisions\/4905"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4890"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4890"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4890"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}