{"id":390,"date":"2005-06-27T01:15:00","date_gmt":"2005-06-27T05:15:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=390"},"modified":"2005-06-27T01:15:00","modified_gmt":"2005-06-27T05:15:00","slug":"the-intellectual-versus-the-football-star","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=390","title":{"rendered":"The Intellectual Versus The Football Star"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On my post bellow on <a href=\"http:\/\/calgarygrit.blogspot.com\/2005\/06\/straight-eye-for-straight-guy.html#comments\">Stephen Harper\u2019s image make-over<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/weblogs.macleans.ca\/paulwells\/\">Paul Wells <\/a>jumped in with his view that Harper should roll out the Conservative platform this summer. The thinking is that this will eliminate the \u201chidden agenda\u201d talk and show that there\u2019s more behind him than angry words and hockey trivia.<\/p>\n<p>I really do have mixed opinions on this. I do think that policy is where Harper&#8217;s focus should be. I really have a hard time believing that Canadians refuse to vote for Harper because he\u2019s not personable enough. I think it\u2019s somewhat insulting to the electorate to announce to them that Stephen Harper will toss a football around and that they should vote for him as a result of it. If you asked most Canadians if they\u2019d rather have Preston Manning or Stockwell Day running the CPC, I\u2019d wager most would pick the geeky policy wonk over the flashy pretty boy.<\/p>\n<p>But I don\u2019t think that means he should reveal the entire Tory platform right now for a few reasons. First of all, a lot can, and will, change in the 8 months from now until the next election. The Supreme Court Health Care decision is an example of that. I think it\u2019s also fairly obvious that at least one Liberal Minister is going to bungle something between now and then to the extent that the CPC will want to highlight it in their platform. If something goes wrong and it\u2019s not addressed in the released platform, the Liberals will be able to say \u201cwell, the Conservatives wouldn\u2019t have done this any differently, so don\u2019t blame us.\u201d The reason the Bloc does so well is because they can criticize without worrying about governing. The second you tell people exactly how you&#8217;d govern, it makes it very hard to be critical.<\/p>\n<p>One also assumes that some changes will have to be made between this platform and platform 2.0 that Harper will release once the campaign gets going. And once those changes are made he\u2019ll be branded a flip-flopper or an opportunist \u2013 whether that\u2019s fair or not.<\/p>\n<p>And finally, I think that releasing a platform in stages during a campaign is a great way to keep media attention on yourself and your ideas once the campaign gets going. If he wants to present himself as a man of ideas but has already shown all his cards, the media isn\u2019t going to want to cover his ideas come campaign time. Instead, they\u2019re gonna want to find some backbench idiot who thinks abortionists should be tried for murder.<\/p>\n<p>That said, there are a lot of benefits to releasing parts of the platform now. A lot of media pundits have been saying that instead of barbecues, Harper should go speak at conferences and share his ideas. I couldn\u2019t agree more. Everyone keeps saying that Stephen Harper is a smart guy with lots of ideas. Well, let\u2019s see it. Let him talk on big issues and prove that he\u2019s an intellectual. He doesn\u2019t need to give away the entire platform but why not give a talk on federalism? On democratic reform? On changing the tax code?<\/p>\n<p>The bottom line is that the \u201chidden agenda\u201d is still killing Harper. And it seems to me that <strong>the worst possible way to fight hidden agenda talk is to tell people that you\u2019re going to put on an act to seem nicer than you actually are.<\/strong> If the real Stephen Harper is a non-scary intellectual, then show people a non-scary intellectual rather than a non-scary prom king.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On my post bellow on Stephen Harper\u2019s image make-over, Paul Wells jumped in with his view that Harper should roll out the Conservative platform this summer. The thinking is that this will eliminate the \u201chidden agenda\u201d talk and show that there\u2019s more behind him than angry words and hockey trivia. I really do have mixed [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/390"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=390"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/390\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=390"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=390"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=390"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}