{"id":318,"date":"2005-04-27T00:28:00","date_gmt":"2005-04-27T04:28:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=318"},"modified":"2005-04-27T00:28:00","modified_gmt":"2005-04-27T04:28:00","slug":"318","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=318","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><span style=\"font-size:130%;\">Let&#8217;s Make a Deal!<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;d love to go into a big long policy discussion debating the merits of spending money on corporate tax cuts versus affordable <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/servlet\/story\/RTGAM.20050426.w3martin0426\/BNStory\/National\/\">housing, public transit, post-secondary education and foreign aid<\/a> . Honestly, I think this is a huge improvement on the budget and the areas where Layton is redirecting money are areas money should be spent (notice how Jack didn&#8217;t say &#8220;throw it all into healthcare&#8221;). But, let&#8217;s be perfectly honest &#8211; it ain&#8217;t gonna make a difference. With Chuck Cadman hinting he&#8217;ll vote against the government and both sick Tory MPs declaring themselves able to make it to Ottawa, this government is likely to go down before the budget is passed. And I have a sneaking suspicion that Prime Minister Stephen Harper is unlikely to keep 1.6 billion for affordable housing while the eight car garages of Canadian CEOs remain half empty.<\/p>\n<p>So, let&#8217;s assume the government falls and look at the fallout of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.blogscanada.ca\/egroup\/PermaLink.aspx?guid=043621e5-28a0-40a4-a59a-7f3c0685e890\">this deal <\/a>from a purely political perspective.<\/p>\n<p><strong>NDP:<\/strong> For years the NDP has been nothing more than that collection of Shakespeare books in your bookcase that you never read; no real purpose and mostly for show. But people are finally reading the Bard! The NDP is&#8230;gasp&#8230;relevant! I know, I&#8217;m as shocked as you to realize this. I can only imagine how giddy NDP supporters must feel to be making a difference (well, in theory) on the national stage. This deal works for Layton on a few levels:<br \/>1) It makes him seen as a real player and gets him a ton of media exposure<br \/>2) It shows people a vote for the NDP is not a wasted vote<br \/>3) It gets his message out there. He supports education, the environment, and affordable housing over corporate tax cuts. That&#8217;s not a bad message.<br \/>4) It shows he&#8217;s trying to make Parliament work.<br \/>5) It shows he&#8217;s against an early election.<\/p>\n<p>The only real drawback is that he might be seen as propping up the Liberals and it gives Harper full control of the sponsorship issue. It&#8217;ll be harder for Layton to argue the Liberals don&#8217;t have the &#8220;moral authority&#8221; to govern when he&#8217;s supporting them.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Liberals: <\/strong>The good for Paulie is it <em>may<\/em> put off a spring election. But even if we go to the polls this spring, there&#8217;s some good in this:<br \/>1) Having the &#8220;moral conscience&#8221; of Parliament support your government is a big plus when the next election will be fought on corruption.<br \/>2) The Liberals will be seen as moving left which might bring back some disgruntled Bloc and Dipper voters to the fold.<br \/>3) Martin will be able to talk up the unholy alliance of Stephen Harper and Jean La&#8230;I mean, Gilles Ducceppe.<\/p>\n<p>But, there are some drawbacks:<br \/>1) Martin will be seen as trying to buy his way out of an election.<br \/>2) Having Jack Layton set the agenda will not help dispel the perception that Martin is a pushover.<br \/>3) The business community will not be amused.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Conservatives:<\/strong> For Harper, this is likely about as appealing as a candid Randy White tell-all press conference. Harper will be seen as the one bringing down the government and he&#8217;ll be seen as the one working with the Bloc to do it. And with campaign finance laws in place, having Bay Street turn on Martin won&#8217;t make much of a difference.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Bloc: <\/strong>Quoi? Quelle deal?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Let&#8217;s Make a Deal! I&#8217;d love to go into a big long policy discussion debating the merits of spending money on corporate tax cuts versus affordable housing, public transit, post-secondary education and foreign aid . Honestly, I think this is a huge improvement on the budget and the areas where Layton is redirecting money are [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=318"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=318"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=318"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=318"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}