{"id":2987,"date":"2011-04-25T17:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-04-25T21:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=2987"},"modified":"2012-05-29T16:56:45","modified_gmt":"2012-05-29T20:56:45","slug":"poll-soup-what-the-ndp-surge-means","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=2987","title":{"rendered":"Poll Soup: What the NDP surge means"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Trying to make sense of what the NDP&#8217;s Quebec surge means in terms of seats is a difficult game. For starters, most public polls lump all of Quebec together when, in reality, a voter in Montreal is very different from a voter in Abitibi. Just because the Liberals or Conservatives are down province-wide, it doesn&#8217;t mean their incumbents are in danger, because their vote is so concentrated.<\/p>\n<p>Even more challenging is trying to understand how a surge like this will be spread across the province. Most seat projections use the 2008 election as their baseline &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/calgarygrit.blogspot.com\/2011\/04\/updated-seat-projections.html\">my model<\/a> is based primarily on 2008, but it also factors in the previous 2 elections and a regression &#8220;prediction&#8221; based on riding demographics. I think that&#8217;s a key improvement since it includes information about the <em>voters<\/em>, not just how they&#8217;ve <em>voted<\/em> in the past, but even then, all that data is from the old reality. We&#8217;re living in a very new reality.<\/p>\n<p>If the NDP doubles or triples their Quebec-wide vote, it&#8217;s <em>impossible <\/em>to predict what the impact will be in each individual riding. The simulation model I use factors this in to a certain extent, which is why I report the <strong>probability <\/strong>of a given seat going to each party, rather than boldly saying if they&#8217;ll will win or lose. But the end result of this is a 95% confidence interval for NDP seats in Quebec of 3 to 19 &#8211; that&#8217;s hardly a precise target, and there are a lot of seats they have between a 4% and 8% chance of winning&#8230;with a few more polls showing the Dippers in first, that range will creep up.<\/p>\n<p>Pundits Guide has a good article on the danger of taking these projections as the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.punditsguide.ca\/2011\/04\/rubber-hits-the-road-for-parties-and-seat-projectors\/comment-page-1\/\">gospel truth<\/a>. It&#8217;s also important to remember that a lot can change in a week &#8211; just because something is projected today, it doesn&#8217;t mean it will come to pass on May 2nd.<\/p>\n<p>So with all those caveats, here&#8217;s where we stand with 7 days to go (<em>change since <a href=\"http:\/\/calgarygrit.blogspot.com\/2011\/04\/poll-soup-and-here-come-ndp.html\">last week<\/a> in brackets<\/em>):<\/p>\n<p><strong>CPC<\/strong> 38.6% (+0.5)<br \/><strong>Lib<\/strong> 25.7% (-1.3)<br \/><strong>NDP<\/strong> 22.0% (+1.9)<br \/><strong>BQ<\/strong> 7.6% (-0.7)<br \/><strong>Green<\/strong> 5.1% (-0.4)<\/p>\n<p>Keep in mind that with the exception of a turkey-dinner fueled <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nanosresearch.com\/election2011\/20110424-BallotE.pdf\">Nanos poll<\/a>, we haven&#8217;t seen data from any phone calls conducted since last Wednesday (<em>NOTE &#8211; I ran this before today&#8217;s Innovative and Environics polls were released<\/em>).<\/p>\n<p>So the above vote and the following seat projections could very well change significantly in the coming days. As such, I&#8217;ll be back with updated projections later this week, a closer look at the seats to watch in each region over the weekend, and a final projection on Sunday night. Also, I&#8217;ll post daily seat projections on <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/#!\/calgarygrit\">Twitter<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/-2xJB9Eay5AM\/TbXEmkxAurI\/AAAAAAAACaY\/L4gZtVSu8-0\/s1600\/boxplots.JPG\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 318px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 320px; CURSOR: hand\" id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5599597878688398002\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/-2xJB9Eay5AM\/TbXEmkxAurI\/AAAAAAAACaY\/L4gZtVSu8-0\/s320\/boxplots.JPG\" \/><\/a><br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/-NPpNtB8csJQ\/TbXEzFU0fAI\/AAAAAAAACa4\/13zr-_CBJsE\/s1600\/weekly%2Bseat%2Btotals.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 240px; CURSOR: hand\" id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5599598093586955266\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/-NPpNtB8csJQ\/TbXEzFU0fAI\/AAAAAAAACa4\/13zr-_CBJsE\/s320\/weekly%2Bseat%2Btotals.jpg\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Not surprisingly, the largest NDP movement has come in Quebec, where they&#8217;ve gone from a 0-7 seat range last week, up to a 3-18 range this week. These gains have come almost exclusively at the Bloc&#8217;s expense, with Liberal and Conservative seat ranges in Quebec unchanged from last week:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/-nyCXNy-z0V4\/TbXEwKlGTcI\/AAAAAAAACaw\/Lwyj0X5mTRg\/s1600\/ranges.JPG\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 122px; CURSOR: hand\" id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5599598043457801666\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/-nyCXNy-z0V4\/TbXEwKlGTcI\/AAAAAAAACaw\/Lwyj0X5mTRg\/s320\/ranges.JPG\" \/><\/a><br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/-BEAWIUc-8Uc\/TbXEtfgL4WI\/AAAAAAAACao\/oB5k33IW968\/s1600\/means.JPG\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 205px; CURSOR: hand\" id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5599597997534732642\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/-BEAWIUc-8Uc\/TbXEtfgL4WI\/AAAAAAAACao\/oB5k33IW968\/s320\/means.JPG\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>To get a better sense of how well the model is handling the wacky world of Quebec politics, consider the following two riding polls, released today (and fielded last week):<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cyberpresse.ca\/la-voix-de-lest\/actualites\/201104\/22\/01-4392760-brome-missisquoi-la-vague-npd-setend.php\">Brome Mississquoi<\/a> &#8211; Bloc 32%, Lib 26%, NDP 26%, CPC 11%<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/tvanouvelles.ca\/lcn\/infos\/national\/federales2011\/archives\/2011\/04\/20110424-071516.html\">Chambly Borduas<\/a> &#8211; Bloc 37%, NDP 24%, Lib 15%, CPC 7%<\/p>\n<p>Comparatively speaking, my model has Brome as a 35% chance of going Bloc, 35% chance of going Liberal, and 28% chance of going NDP. Which makes a lot of sense given the riding survey findings. It also underscores why a probability model is so much better for these kind of ridings. A simple projection would just put it down as a Bloc victory, without recognizing there&#8217;s a very good chance the Liberals and NDP could very well win it.<\/p>\n<p>In Chambly, I still show the Bloc with a 96% chance of winning, with the NDP at just 4% &#8211; once again, this is consistent with the riding poll that has the Bloc up by 13 points.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Trying to make sense of what the NDP&#8217;s Quebec surge means in terms of seats is a difficult game. For starters, most public polls lump all of Quebec together when, in reality, a voter in Montreal is very different from a voter in Abitibi. Just because the Liberals or Conservatives are down province-wide, it doesn&#8217;t [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1019,983,11,411],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2987","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-2011-federal-election","category-federal-politics","category-polls","category-seat-projections"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2987","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2987"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2987\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3597,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2987\/revisions\/3597"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2987"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2987"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2987"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}