{"id":2890,"date":"2011-03-15T16:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-15T20:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=2890"},"modified":"2011-03-15T16:00:00","modified_gmt":"2011-03-15T20:00:00","slug":"who-does-number-2-work-for","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=2890","title":{"rendered":"Who does number 2 work for?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>If you haven&#8217;t gotten a chance to <a href=\"http:\/\/calgarygrit.blogspot.com\/2011\/03\/ad-watch.html\">rate the latest batch of political commercials<\/a>, be sure to put on your ad wizard hat and give it a go.<\/p>\n<p>While I didn&#8217;t include them in that set, the NDP has also released new French print and TV ads (ht <a href=\"http:\/\/www.punditsguide.ca\/2011\/03\/campaign-innovation-qr-codes\/\">Pundits Guide<\/a>):<\/p>\n<p><img style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 213px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 320px; CURSOR: hand\" id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5583036501780055042\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/-AOFbvzBtcIE\/TXruHkCjxAI\/AAAAAAAACNQ\/AxoQg4VBct0\/s320\/Layton_Mulcair_NPD_2001_Poster.jpg\" \/><\/p>\n<p><center><object style=\"WIDTH: 480px; HEIGHT: 293px\"><param name=\"movie\" value=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/EXEuTTTyOzE?version=3\"><param name=\"allowFullScreen\" value=\"true\"><param name=\"allowScriptAccess\" value=\"always\"><embed src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/EXEuTTTyOzE?version=3\" type=\"application\/x-shockwave-flash\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" allowscriptaccess=\"always\" width=\"480\" height=\"293\"><\/embed><\/object><\/center><\/p>\n<p>You&#8217;ve probably noticed these ads have even more facial hair than usual, even by NDP standards. That&#8217;s because of the prominent position of Layton&#8217;s second in command, Thomas Mulcair. It seems highly likely the NDP&#8217;s Quebec campaign will be placing as much emphasis on Mulcair this election as on Layton.<\/p>\n<p>Although we haven&#8217;t seen this tactic in recent elections, it&#8217;s not unheard of. Canadian politics has always been leader-dominated, but the supporting cast can still be used to make a point. After all, past leaders have relied heavily on strong Cabinet Ministers &#8211; the Paul Martins, CD Howes, and, err, Paul Martin <em>Seniors <\/em>of of the world.<\/p>\n<p>If you go back far enough, the Liberals won the 1896 election on the slogan of &#8220;<em>Laurier, Mowat, and Victory<\/em>&#8220;. And who among us will ever forget the 1872 election commercial that featured John A. MacDonald and George Etienne Cartier strolling through a park together?<\/p>\n<p>So all of this begs the question &#8211; will other parties follow the NDP&#8217;s lead in emphasizing the team?<\/p>\n<p>Stephen Harper doesn&#8217;t let his MPs go to the bathroom without his permission and it seems highly unlikely the man who insists the government of Canada be called &#8220;the Harper government&#8221; is going to share the spotlight. And, heck, at the rate we&#8217;re going, he <a href=\"http:\/\/calgarygrit.blogspot.com\/2011\/03\/exodus.html\">may not have any Cabinet Ministers left to share it with by the time the election hits<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Gilles Duceppe has fought five elections as BQ leader and is insanely popular. He doesn&#8217;t need to worry about ever forming a Cabinet so who really cares about the rest of the team? It will be all Gilles all the time on Bloc TV.<\/p>\n<p>As for the Greens? Maybe Georges Laraque will appear. After all, he does have <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.ca\/imgres?imgurl=http:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/_BjwutFO7-jM\/TEV_ksA0ZTI\/AAAAAAAAAs8\/y8WXQsv7YAc\/s1600\/teksavvy-sans-contrat.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http:\/\/code18.blogspot.com\/2010\/07\/separes-la-naissance-georges-laraque-et.html&amp;usg=__H6IwR89GT0tJwXv5dvMjnbmh1Ko=&amp;h=384&amp;w=512&amp;sz=61&amp;hl=en&amp;start=0&amp;sig2=_e_-WutoT3jgZjMt11TZwQ&amp;zoom=1&amp;tbnid=6ZBmEb91PUIMtM:&amp;tbnh=150&amp;tbnw=217&amp;ei=3vN6TcPKH4fCqwG3sKjiBg&amp;prev=\/images%3Fq%3Dgeorges%2Blaraque%2Bteksavvy%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26rlz%3D1T4GGLL_enCA341CA341%26biw%3D1259%26bih%3D599%26tbs%3Disch:1&amp;um=1&amp;itbs=1&amp;iact=hc&amp;vpx=374&amp;vpy=84&amp;dur=1398&amp;hovh=194&amp;hovw=259&amp;tx=179&amp;ty=114&amp;oei=3vN6TcPKH4fCqwG3sKjiBg&amp;page=1&amp;ndsp=15&amp;ved=1t:429,r:1,s:0\">commercial experience<\/a>. But realistically, getting Canadians to know Elizabeth May is going to be challenge enough on the Green&#8217;s meager advertising budget&#8230;they&#8217;re a one seat and one woman show.<\/p>\n<p>Which brings us to the Liberals. On the face of it, they seem to be the most likely to try the team approach. They have a less popular leader and a solid front bench. But there are two obvious problems that come from over emphasizing the supporting cast.<\/p>\n<p>The first, more obvious problem, is <em>who<\/em> to emphasize? Like the Tories, many of their better known MPs come with their share of baggage &#8211; Bob Rae, Denis Coderre, and Justin Trudeau are probably more likely to find their way in <em>other <\/em>parties&#8217; commercials than the Liberals&#8217;. Sure, you could toss Ken Dryden into a spot because, let&#8217;s face it, who doesn&#8217;t love Ken Dryden? But to what end? Having a candidate who once played hockey in a <a href=\"http:\/\/fullcomment.nationalpost.com\/2011\/03\/14\/you-say-hockey-arena-ignatieff-says-public-space\/\">public space that promotes culture<\/a> doesn&#8217;t say anything about the kind of leader <em>Ignatieff<\/em> would be.<\/p>\n<p>Which brings up the second point. Right now, the biggest challenge facing the Liberals is that Canadians don&#8217;t know much about Ignatieff outside of what they&#8217;ve seen in <em>Just Visiting <\/em>ads. The Liberals need to sell Ignatieff to voters <em>before<\/em> they can even think about selling the rest of the team.<\/p>\n<p>Considering this, it&#8217;s a safe bet that outside of a few regional hits or background cameos, Thomas Mulcair will be the most prominently featured supporting character in the spring election TV season.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If you haven&#8217;t gotten a chance to rate the latest batch of political commercials, be sure to put on your ad wizard hat and give it a go. While I didn&#8217;t include them in that set, the NDP has also released new French print and TV ads (ht Pundits Guide): You&#8217;ve probably noticed these ads [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2890"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2890"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2890\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2890"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2890"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2890"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}