{"id":1720,"date":"2008-03-27T19:19:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-27T23:19:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=1720"},"modified":"2008-03-27T19:19:00","modified_gmt":"2008-03-27T23:19:00","slug":"fight-fight-fight","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=1720","title":{"rendered":"Fight! Fight! Fight!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s gotten to the point where it&#8217;s almost weird when John Tory is the one <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/servlet\/story\/RTGAM.20080327.wtorycivilservants0327\/BNStory\/National\/home\">criticizing McGuinty <\/a>and explaining how the Tories would run Ontario. I thought John had permanently deferred to Van Loan\/Flaherty\/Poilievre on that.<\/p>\n<p>Yesterday it was Pierre Poilievre displaying his usual class in response to the following rather benign criticisms the small man of confederation leveled at Harper&#8217;s immigration plan:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family:arial;\">Then he was asked about the sweeping new federal immigration reforms and he replied that his own ancestors were unskilled workers &#8211; just like the parents of some Canadian Rhodes scholars.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I wouldn&#8217;t want to shut out folks who don&#8217;t have a skill. I wouldn&#8217;t be here,&#8221; McGuinty told a news conference.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We were part of the exodus from Ireland at the time of famine. We had no skills, we couldn&#8217;t speak English, and we were dirt-poor.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;But we were looking for opportunity and we brought with us a solid work ethic.&#8221;<\/span> <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>So Poilievre responded showing the usual maturity he has become known for, first saying that immigration was a federal jurisdiction and then <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/servlet\/story\/RTGAM.20080326.wont_harper0236\/BNStory\/National\/home?cid=al_gam_mostview\">attacking<\/a> provincial immigration policy (anyone else catch the fun contradiction there?):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family:arial;\">&#8220;All Dalton McGuinty has ever done on immigration is run a sponsorship-style slush fund that cost him his citizenship minister,&#8221; Mr. Poilievre said in an interview.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Now, assuming the Conservative position is that it&#8217;s OK for Ottawa to offer economic advice to Ontario, one wonders why it&#8217;s not alright for Ontario to offer immigration advice to Ottawa. After all, it&#8217;s not like McGuinty turned the Ontario Liberal website into a <a href=\"http:\/\/calgarygrit.blogspot.com\/2008\/03\/blame-ontario-it-seems-that-everythings.html\">giant attack ad on Harper<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The most popular game in Ottawa has become trying to guess Harper&#8217;s motives which seem to make about as much sense as a typical Lost episode. Here&#8217;s a few of the theories I&#8217;ve seen floating around &#8211; there are probably more:<\/p>\n<p>1. They want to blame McGuinty for the impending economic slump<br \/>2. This will help CPC fundraising<br \/>3. Trying to hurt the &#8220;Liberal&#8221; brand in Ontario<br \/>4. Trying to damage a future McGuinty run for LPC leader<br \/>5. There are enough people who dislike McGuinty that this will get them votes<br \/>6. Flaherty wants to replace John Tory<br \/>7. This is to remind Ontarians that they like federal\/provincial fighting<br \/>8. Deflect attention from Cadman\/Mulroney<br \/>9. A chance to re-emphasize that they&#8217;re the party of tax cuts without having to actually cut taxes<br \/>10. Portray Tories as being best for the economy<br \/>11. Beating up Stephane Dion isn&#8217;t challenging enough anymore<br \/>12. Harper just likes picking fights with people<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s gotten to the point where it&#8217;s almost weird when John Tory is the one criticizing McGuinty and explaining how the Tories would run Ontario. I thought John had permanently deferred to Van Loan\/Flaherty\/Poilievre on that. Yesterday it was Pierre Poilievre displaying his usual class in response to the following rather benign criticisms the small [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[55],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1720","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ontario-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1720","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1720"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1720\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}