{"id":1617,"date":"2008-01-08T19:52:00","date_gmt":"2008-01-09T00:52:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=1617"},"modified":"2008-01-08T19:52:00","modified_gmt":"2008-01-09T00:52:00","slug":"primary-numbers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=1617","title":{"rendered":"Primary Numbers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s election night in New Hampshire as the tiny state of one million people helps select the next President. I&#8217;ll be flipping back and forth between the results and the hockey game so expect updates here throughout the evening. Given that I&#8217;m neither a New <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_0\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_0\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_0\">Hamshirite<\/span><\/span><\/span> nor an American, I&#8217;m aware that my opinion doesn&#8217;t really matter but here&#8217;s my thoughts on the candidates who could still win the Presidency:<\/p>\n<p><strong><\/strong><br \/><u><strong>Democrats<\/strong> <\/u><\/p>\n<p>I would have been on the Gore bandwagon had he decided to toss his hat in but, understandably, he&#8217;s happy winning everything <em>except <\/em>the Presidency (although some could argue he has already won that too&#8230;). As it is, I keep bouncing back and forth between the three front runners.<\/p>\n<p>I really like what <strong>Barack <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_1\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_1\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_1\">Obama<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/strong> represents&#8230;I jut don&#8217;t really understand why he represents what he represents. I have yet to see any coherent argument as to why he represents &#8220;change&#8221; more than <strong>Edwards<\/strong> or <strong>Clinton<\/strong> but, hey, it&#8217;s a fun ride to watch and he&#8217;d make a hell of a candidate. But Hillary&#8217;s getting attacked by Lou <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_2\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_2\">Dobbs<\/span><\/span> right now so that probably means she&#8217;s doing something right, and Edwards has as much charisma and better policy than either of the other two so I&#8217;d be fine with any of them.<\/p>\n<p><u><strong>Republicans<\/strong> <\/u><\/p>\n<p>This race <span style=\"color:#ffff00;\">is the<\/span> fun one. I&#8217;m joining Jesus and Chuck Norris in endorsing <strong>Mike <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_3\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_3\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_3\">Huckabee<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/strong>. Not only is a regular on the <em>Colbert Report<\/em> but, as pointed out recently by a few <a href=\"http:\/\/braedencaley.blogspot.com\/2008\/01\/huckabee-and-canada-national-igloo.html\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_4\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_4\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_4\">libloggers<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a>, he&#8217;s made a 22 Minutes cameo:<\/p>\n<p><object height=\"355\" width=\"425\"><param name=\"movie\" value=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/K45UtvpGV_M&amp;rel=1\"><param name=\"wmode\" value=\"transparent\"><embed src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/K45UtvpGV_M&#038;rel=1\" type=\"application\/x-shockwave-flash\" wmode=\"transparent\" width=\"425\" height=\"355\"><\/embed><\/object><\/p>\n<p>If you thought <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_5\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_5\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_5\">Stockwell<\/span><\/span><\/span> Day was a fun candidate to follow, just imagine <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_6\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_6\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_6\">Stockwell<\/span><\/span><\/span> Day with a sense of humour!<\/p>\n<p>From Colbert&#8217;s buddy, we move to Jon Stewart&#8217;s. <strong>John McCain<\/strong> is expected to win tonight and has staged quite the comeback after being left for dead this fall. McCain is probably the most electable man in the field, although the generation gap is going to be the size of the Grand Canyon if it&#8217;s him against <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_7\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_7\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_7\">Obama<\/span><\/span><\/span>. He gets full marks for the best line of the New Hampshire debates when he agreed wholeheartedly that <strong>Mitt Romney<\/strong> is the candidate of change.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fred Thompson<\/strong>, to the best of my knowledge, is still in this race, but it&#8217;s possible he&#8217;s dropped out and I just missed it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Rudy Giuliani<\/strong> is just hoping no one forgets about him by the time Super Tuesday rolls around. I don&#8217;t mind Rudy &#8211; he <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_8\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_8\">cameo&#8217;d<\/span><\/span> on Seinfeld once &#8211; but I have a hard time endorsing someone if his win means having to look up the spelling of his name every time I post about him during his Presidency.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em><u>LIVE UPDATES<\/u>:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>8:00 pm: The polls close and CNN makes the ever-so-bold prediction that&#8230;John Edwards will be third! I guess they&#8217;re going to hold off on that bold &#8220;Richardson finishes fourth&#8221; call until some more data comes in.<\/p>\n<p>8:05 pm: CNN is profiling Salem now. Full credit to Wolf <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_9\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_9\">Blitzer<\/span><\/span> for resisting the obvious Hillary Clinton joke.<\/p>\n<p>8:16 pm: CNN projects that McCain wins New Hampshire. I guess it&#8217;s time for Romney to get those push polls into the field in South Carolina&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>8:32 pm: Clinton 40%, <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_10\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_10\">Obama<\/span><\/span> 36%, Edwards 17%, Richardson 4%. You know, I&#8217;m shocked that <a href=\"http:\/\/jmbell.org\/blog\/2007\/12\/04\/presidents-jed-bartlett-and-matt-santos-both-endorse-governor-bill-richardson\/\">Jed Bartlett&#8217;s endorsement <\/a><em>in his home state <\/em>couldn&#8217;t move votes for Richardson.<\/p>\n<p>10:24 pm: Edwards is <span class=\"blsp-spelling-corrected\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_11\">conceding<\/span> now and he&#8217;s using the <a href=\"http:\/\/snltranscripts.jt.org\/00\/00adebate.phtml\"><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_12\">SNL<\/span> Gore &#8220;health care&#8221; speech<\/a>&#8230;or at least a very close approximation to it. Clinton&#8217;s up by over 4,000 votes with 63% of the polls in, so it certainly <em>appears <\/em>that she&#8217;ll eek this one out. Not a great result if you think about it but, given the polls over the last two days, it likely leaves the Democratic nomination as a pick &#8217;em.<\/p>\n<p>I think the take home message from tonight is that Super Tuesday is going to be <strong>very <\/strong>interesting for both parties. And, while it&#8217;s still early, does anyone else get the sense that the Republican nomination might actually come down to a delegated convention?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s election night in New Hampshire as the tiny state of one million people helps select the next President. I&#8217;ll be flipping back and forth between the results and the hockey game so expect updates here throughout the evening. Given that I&#8217;m neither a New Hamshirite nor an American, I&#8217;m aware that my opinion doesn&#8217;t [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1617","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1617","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1617"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1617\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1617"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1617"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1617"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}