{"id":1324,"date":"2007-03-16T16:15:00","date_gmt":"2007-03-16T20:15:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=1324"},"modified":"2007-03-16T16:15:00","modified_gmt":"2007-03-16T20:15:00","slug":"neck-and-neck-and-neck","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=1324","title":{"rendered":"Neck and Neck and Neck"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.canada.com\/montrealgazette\/features\/quebecvotes2007\/story.html?id=374745c9-a8b3-4e98-a770-d489df2ad121&#038;k=63083\">Wow<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Liberals  33%<br \/><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_0\">PQ<\/span>  30%<br \/><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_1\">ADQ<\/span>  30%<\/p>\n<p>First of all, I guess I was <a href=\"http:\/\/calgarygrit.blogspot.com\/2007\/03\/le-debat.html\">wrong, wrong, wrong <\/a>about Tuesday&#8217;s debate. To me, it looked like <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_2\">Charest<\/span> had won and <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_3\">Dumont<\/span> was nothing more than a hyperactive squirrel (think Jack Layton in the 2004 debates) but it seems <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_4\">Quebecers<\/span> saw it differently or, at the very least, the overpass stunt paid some <span class=\"blsp-spelling-corrected\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_5\">dividends<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>So this leaves the election outcome a complete <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_6\">crapshot<\/span>. <em>Any <\/em>of the three parties could conceivably form what will almost certainly be Quebec&#8217;s first minority government in over a century.<\/p>\n<p>And that is what makes today&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/servlet\/story\/RTGAM.20070316.wreferendum0316\/BNStory\/National\/home\">proclamation <\/a>by Andre <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_7\">Boisclair<\/span> so interesting:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family:arial;\">The <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_8\">Parti<\/span> <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_9\">Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois<\/span> would want to hold a referendum on sovereignty even if it forms only a minority government, leader <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_10\">Andr\u00e9<\/span> <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_11\">Boisclair<\/span> said Friday.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> Obviously, <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_12\">Boisclair<\/span> would never get a referendum law passed in a minority government so he&#8217;s just blowing smoke up the electorate&#8217;s ass. But if he maintains that his <em><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_13\">raison<\/span> <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_14\">d&#8217;\u00eatre<\/span> <\/em>of forming government is to hold another referendum, it becomes hard to see how Mario <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_15\">Dumont<\/span> could justify proping up a Boisclair government. If you don&#8217;t believe in the first priority of the government, how can you say you have confidence in them? Especially after the two bickered to no end on Tuesday and have very little common ground anywhere in their platforms.<\/p>\n<p>What I&#8217;m getting at is, let&#8217;s suppose, the numbers above hold and we get a seat breakdown similar to what <a href=\"http:\/\/www.predictionshkdp.com\/\">Hill &#038; <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_16\">Knowlton<\/span><\/a> predicts (two bad assumptions to make, but, whatever):<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_17\">PQ<\/span>  49<br \/><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_18\">PLQ<\/span>  43<br \/><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_19\">ADQ<\/span>  33<\/p>\n<p>In such a situation, it seems to me that Jean <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_20\">Charest<\/span> could make a <em>very <\/em>strong case to stay as Premier, governing with <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_21\">ADQ<\/span> support. He&#8217;d have won the popular vote and could promise a more stable government than <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_22\">Boisclair<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not sure if we&#8217;d see a formal coalition, but I do think that if the <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_23\">ADQ<\/span> does win the most seats, an <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_24\">ADQ<\/span>\/<span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_25\">PLQ<\/span> formal coalition wouldn&#8217;t be outside the realm of possibility. Mostly because <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_26\">Dumont<\/span> doesn&#8217;t have the talent to make a full Cabinet himself but also because he could probably find common ground with <span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_27\">Charest<\/span> on a wide range of issues.<\/p>\n<p>So will it be Peterson\/Rae <em><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_28\">deux<\/span>? <\/em><span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_29\">Peut<\/span>&#8211;<span class=\"blsp-spelling-error\" id=\"SPELLING_ERROR_30\">\u00eatre<\/span>&#8230;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Wow. Liberals 33%PQ 30%ADQ 30% First of all, I guess I was wrong, wrong, wrong about Tuesday&#8217;s debate. To me, it looked like Charest had won and Dumont was nothing more than a hyperactive squirrel (think Jack Layton in the 2004 debates) but it seems Quebecers saw it differently or, at the very least, the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1324"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1324"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1324\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1324"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1324"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1324"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}