{"id":1181,"date":"2006-11-23T02:22:00","date_gmt":"2006-11-23T07:22:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=1181"},"modified":"2006-11-23T02:22:00","modified_gmt":"2006-11-23T07:22:00","slug":"its-come-to-this","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/?p=1181","title":{"rendered":"It&#8217;s Come To This"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><em>3 updates at the bottom&#8230;<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>On his blog, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.warrenkinsella.com\/musings.htm\">Warren Kinsella <\/a>calmly asks: &#8220;WHO WILL SPEAK FOR CANADA, NOW?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Well, to answer Warren&#8217;s question, it appears that the man who will speak for Canada is&#8230;wait for it&#8230;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.thestar.com\/NASApp\/cs\/ContentServer?pagename=thestar\/Layout\/Article_Type1&#038;c=Article&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;cid=1164193751721&#038;call_pageid=968332188492&amp;col=968793972154&#038;t=TS_Home\">Jimmy K<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family:arial;\">However, at least one Liberal, Jim Karygiannis, said he would oppose [Harper&#8217;s motion].<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAre we going to have a Greek nation within Canada, a Ukrainian nation within Canada, a Chinese nation within Canada? Sorry, Canada is the nation,\u201d Karygiannis asked.<\/span> <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong><em>UPDATE: <\/em><\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/andrewcoyne.com\/2006\/11\/that-didnt-take-long.php\">Andrew Coyne<\/a>, who is shockingly not amused by this, has more reaction, including <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/servlet\/story\/RTGAM.20061122.wquebreac1122\/BNStory\/Front\">this piece<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>UPDATE 2:<\/em><\/strong> Go on and Bleed has some <a href=\"http:\/\/goonandbleed.blogspot.com\/2006\/11\/dead-men-talking.html\">classic quotes<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>UPDATE 3 &#8211; A United Canada?: <\/em><\/strong>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/servlet\/story\/RTGAM.20061123.wnationreax1123\/BNStory\/Front\">Globe <\/a>has quotes from some living people:<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Quebec Premier Jean Charest: \u201cThe recognition of Quebec as a nation is a way for us to occupy the place that is owed us in Canada and elsewhere in the world. In my view it is a very significant gesture.\u201d (The Globe and Mail)<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Manitoba Premier Gary Doer: \u201cTo me, Canada is one nation, one country. I understand Quebec is unique in terms of language, culture and law, but Canada is one country.\u201d (Winnipeg Free Press)<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Alberta Residents League chairman Pat Beauchamp: \u201cGo ahead. If you are a nation within a nation, just go ahead and leave. Leave completely.\u201d (Calgary Herald)<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 The Edmonton Sun: \u201cUp until about mid-afternoon yesterday, we thought Prime Minister Stephen Harper was doing a pretty good job in the office he was handed \u2013 if only on a trial basis \u2013 last January. But some time about halfway between lunchtime and the supper hour yesterday he lost us. And we fear he may have turned off a whole lot of other Canadians in the process.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 The Globe and Mail: \u201cMr. Harper has mitigated the damage by removing most of the political sting from the word (nation), while leaving the recognition of Quebeckers as a special community within Canada. Hard to argue with that, even if you belong to a different special community.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 The National Post: \u201cWe must somehow summon up all our will &#8212; and leave well enough alone. We wish Mr. Harper had had the will to do so, rather than starting down a path few in this country want him to take.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Winnipeg Free Press editorial: \u201cMr. Harper had an opportunity to speak for Canada to all Canadians, and he did not.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>3 updates at the bottom&#8230; On his blog, Warren Kinsella calmly asks: &#8220;WHO WILL SPEAK FOR CANADA, NOW?&#8221; Well, to answer Warren&#8217;s question, it appears that the man who will speak for Canada is&#8230;wait for it&#8230;Jimmy K: However, at least one Liberal, Jim Karygiannis, said he would oppose [Harper&#8217;s motion]. \u201cAre we going to have [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1181","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1181","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1181"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1181\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1181"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1181"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.calgarygrit.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1181"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}